Winnipeg Jewish Review  
Site Search:
Home  |  Archives  |  Contact Us
 
Features Local Israel Next Generation Arts/Op-Eds Editorial/Letters Links Obituary/In Memoriam

Deborah Lipstadt
Credit: Deborah Lipstadt


David Irving
Credit: Public Domain

 
WILLIAM PITCH, CISA'S NEW STUDENT CORRESPONDENT ON THE LIPSTADT-IRVING TRIAL AND HOLOCAUST DENIAL

William Pitch, student at Gray Academy of Jewish Education

Deborah Lipstadt will be delivering CISA's 2013 Shindleman Family Lecture on Monday, April 22, 2013 at 7:30 pm in the Provencher Ballroom at the Hotel Fort Garry. Admission is by donation and everyone is welcome. Dr. Ruth Ashrafi, Rhonda Spivak, and Dr. Catherine Chatterley have arranged for Professor Lipstadt to speak to students at Gray Academy during her visit to Winnipeg.
 

David Irving was once a respected historian specializing in the Second World War, with over thirty books to his credit, on topics as diverse as Convoy PQ-17 and Ernst Rommel, the Desert Fox. He had been one of the first to denounce Gerd Heidemann’s forged “Hitler Diaries”, back in the 1980s. So what if he had a somewhat checkered past, if he had been involved with the British Union of Fascists while in college, if he had made a point of shouting “Heil Hitler” at the wreckage of houses destroyed by the Blitz— Irving’s star was on the rise. Yes, it was known to some people that he had controversial views— he was an apologist for Adolf Hitler— but as long as these views never became public, David Irving would be just fine.

 

Then came Hitler’s War. Published in 1977, this was the book that caused what was a great controversy among historians of Germany and WWII. In it, Irving portrayed Hitler as a rational idealist who only wanted to make Germany powerful again and who was constantly impeded by scheming, traitorous, subordinates— a conclusion, funnily enough, that Hitler himself had espoused during the war. For the purposes of this article, we shall ignore Irving’s selective use of sources, close our eyes to his all-too-obvious bias and his tenuous conclusions, and concentrate on his thesis: that Hitler did not know of the gas chambers, and indeed was actually against the Holocaust— a controversial assertion if ever there was one.

 

This set off alarm bells in the scholarly community; alarm bells that were far overdue. Irving had made other shaky claims in the past, exaggerating the death toll of the Dresden bombings, and blaming Winston Churchill for the death of Polish leader Wladyslaw Sikorski, but this had finally crossed the line. Hitler’s War was widely criticized by historians, who cited Irving’s poor research and dubious historiography. After a few more titles, Irving departed from the legitimate historical community. Several years later, he became an “official” Holocaust denier, endorsing such luminaries as Ernst Zu¨ndel and Fred Leuchter. And then he dropped off the radar for several years— until 1993.

 

“[David] Irving is one of the most dangerous spokespersons for Holocaust denial. Familiar with historical evidence, he bends it until it conforms with his ideological leanings and political agenda. . . . He demands "absolute documentary proof" when it comes to proving the Germans guilty, but he relies on highly circumstantial evidence to condemn the Allies. This is an accurate description not only of Irving's tactics, but of those of deniers in general.” 

 

This is a quotation from Deborah Lipstadt’s 1993 book Denying the Holocaust. Upon hearing of the way she had written about him, Irving became incensed, on one occasion attempting to disrupt a lecture by Lipstadt at DeKalb College, in Atlanta. When she refused to engage with him, Irving declared that her refusal constituted “cowardice” and invalidated her charges. He then distributed free copies of his Göring biography to the attending students. When Lipstadt, after all this, refused to acknowledge him in any way, Irving flew home angry.

 

Three years later, he filed suit against Lipstadt and her publisher, Penguin Books. Far from simply taking issue with the numerous charges she leveled at him— all of which were proven to be to true, incidentally— Irving declared that he resented Lipstadt’s charge of “Holocaust denier” as he believed there was no Holocaust to deny.

 

In suing Lipstadt in an English court, Irving stacked the cards in his favor. Under American law, the plaintiff, or person filing suit, must prove that the libelous statements are both false and malicious. Under English law, the “defendant” or person being sued must prove the libelous statement is true. In this case, Lipstadt and Penguin had to prove three things beyond a showdown of doubt. They had to prove that Irving was a Holocaust denier who had associated with neo-Nazi groups, that he had falsified and twisted historical evidence in h

 
<<Previous Article       Next Article >>
Subscribe to the Winnipeg Jewish Review
  • Meet the Real Fauda Soliders
  • Jewish Federation of Winnipeg
  • CIBC
  • Coughlin Insurance
  • Joyce Rykiss
  • CHW
  • Cantor's Meats
  • Myrna Driedger MLA Roblin Shana Tova
  • ClearCare Periodontal & Implant Centre
  • Esther and Sid Halpern Shana Tovah
  • GTP
  • Jim Muir
  • CDN Visa
  • Terry Duguid
  • Shindico
  • Michael weinstein
  • Munroe Pharmacy
  • Fair Service
  • Eddie's Gravel Supply Ltd.
  • John Bucklaschuk
  • Tyler Bucklaschuk
  • Laufman Reprographics
  • Dakota Chiropractic Office
  • Maric Homes
  • Artista Homes
  • Southwynn Homes
  • Tradesman Mechanical
  • Imperial Soap
  • HUB
  • Winnipeg Drapery
  • Taverna Rodos
  • Capital Grill
  • CVA Systems
  • Stella's
  • Accurate Lawn & Garden
  • Dr. Gary Levine
  • Fetching Style
  • Michel and Danita Aziza and family
  • Ronald B. Zimmerman
  • Allan Davies
  • pizzeria gusto
  • Kristina's Fine Greek Cuisine
  • Total Lighting Sales
  • Miller's Super Valu Meats
  • Canadian Friends of Boys Town Jerusalem
  • Nikos
  • Sarel Canada
  • Santa Lucia Pizza
  • Center for Near East Policy Research
  • Roofco Winnipeg Roofing
  • Center for Near East Policy Research
  • Nachum Bedein
Rhonda Spivak, Editor

Publisher: Spivak's Jewish Review Ltd.


Opinions expressed in letters to the editor or articles by contributing writers are not necessarily endorsed by Winnipeg Jewish Review.