Winnipeg Jewish Review  
Site Search:
Home  |  Archives  |  Contact Us
Features Local Israel Next Generation Arts/Op-Eds Editorial/Letters Links Obituary/In Memoriam

Elliot Leven


By Elliot Leven, January 24, 2013


[Editor's note:  Elliot Leven's piece below is a response to David Matas's article "Settlements and Peace." Matas's article is reprinted in full at the end of Leven's article].


by Elliot Leven, Jan 24, 2013

Israel should avoid building new settlements in the West Bank, not because of international law or abstract moral obligation, but simply out of long-term self-interest.

David Matas has a brilliant academic mind and he is a skillful debater. Mr. Matas correctly points out that, “in principle” there is no reason why the presence of Jews in the West Bank should be a problem. He is correct. In principle, no nation state should restrict citizenship on ethnic or religious grounds. In principle, there is no reason why a future Palestine based in the West Bank and Gaza should not include some Jewish citizens, just as Israel now includes many Arab citizens. Peaceful, multicultural nations like Canada rejoice in the ethnic and cultural diversity of their citizens.
The reality is that the Middle East is neither peaceful nor multicultural, and that ain’t gonna change in the foreseeable future.  
The reality is that the Israeli and Palestinian people are at war. The war waxes and wanes. Things are currently pretty quiet in the West Bank. However, the reality is that most Israelis profoundly distrust Palestinians, and most Palestinians profoundly distrust Israelis. That won’t change in the short-term future.
Perhaps, in the distant future, Israelis and Palestinians might actually cooperate as closely as Canada and the United States cooperate today. If and when that happy day arrives, some Jews will probably choose to live in various West Bank (or Gaza) locations under Palestinian rule, with the warm consent of their Palestinian neigbours.
But nations do not jump directly from a state of war to a state of close friendship. The reality is that almost all wars end with some form of cease-fire. The parties still hate each other, but they agree that it is in their mutual self-interest to stop shooting. If the parties are lucky, the cease-fire holds and the parties gradually grow to hate each other a bit less. The initial peace is a “cold peace”. Over many, many years, the hatred might eventually be replaced with friendship.
For example, England and France were at war, on and off, for centuries. By the start of the 20th century, the two nations were friends and allies. The change happened gradually, over the centuries, with both parties making compromises along the way (for example, England used to have territorial claims on parts of France).
If Israel really wants to make peace, as opposed to simply scoring debating points, it will have to make some painful compromises. The Palestinians will also have to make painful compromises. Other than the few wars that end in absolute surrender, that is the way wars end.
The terms of the peace will have to be mutually agreed upon. Realistically, the terms will probably be something like those set out in the 2003 Geneva Initiative – the unofficial “peace treaty” hammered out by influential Israeli and Palestinian private citizens. The 2003 Geneva Initiative is not carved in stone. Israeli and Palestinian negotiators will eventually want some changes. However, the Initiative does give us a fairly good window into what peace might eventually look like. The Initiative would allow Israel to keep 34 settlements, and would require it to abandon the rest.
Peace is in Israel’s own self-interest. If Israel wants to be pragmatic, as opposed to ideological, it will not build any new settlements (or expand any existing settlements) other than 34 listed in the Initiative. Yes, in principle that might be a shame. But in the real world, that is one of the painful compromises that will pave the way towards peace. 


by  David Matas, posted Jan 14, 2012 

It is common to hear that Israeli settlements on the West Bank are an obstacle to peace. The Israeli announcement of an intention to expand settlements in the West Bank following on the UN vote to give the Palestinian Authority non-member observer status at the United Nations produced a new round of condemnations of these settlements.

Yet, objectively, what is the problem? Why should the settlements be an obstacle to peace?

The Palestinian Authority, to be sure, does not like them. They have become an obstacle to negotiations because the Palestinians have insisted on a freeze on the settlements as a pre-condition for returning to the peace negotiation table. However, all that would be necessary to remove that obstacle would be for the Palestinian Authority to drop the pre-condition. Why is it there?

The current global round of condemnation of settlements hooks onto the Palestinian Authority objection, asserting that the leadership of the Authority is moderate and should be encouraged. That form of condemnation though is derivative. If the Palestinian Authority had no objections to the settlements, the friends of the Palestinian Authority would have none either.

If one goes

<<Previous Article       Next Article >>
Subscribe to the Winnipeg Jewish Review
  • Jewish Federation of Winnipeg
  • Fillmore Riley
  • Jewish Federation of Winnipeg
  • Winter's Collision Repair
  • Gray Academy
  • Jacqueline Simkin
  • Coughlin Insurance
  • Joyce Rykiss
  • CHW
  • The J Hansen HVAC Group
  • Munroe Pharmacy
  • The Lazareck Family
  • Imperial Soap
  • GTP
  • Piston Ring
  • Nick's Inn
  • Lori Shenkarow
  • Roseman Corp.
  • Tyler Bucklaschuk
  • TD Canada Trust
  • Josef Ryan
  • Sobey's
  • Daniel Friedman and Rob Dalgliesh
  • The Lipkin Family
  • Booke and Partners
  • Bruce Shefrin Interior Design
  • Fair Service
  • Daien Denture Clinic
  • Thovaldson Care
  • Laufman Reprographics
  • Amalgamated Drywall Systems Ltd.
  • Maric Homes
  • Artista Homes
  • Tradesman Mechanical
  • Accurate Lawn & Garden
  • Ronald B. Zimmerman
  • Commercial Pool
  • Lanny Silver
  • Fetching Style
  • Rudy Fidel
  • Shindico
  • Dakota Chiropractic Office
  • Myrna Driedger
  • Shirley and Bob Freedman
  • The Chisick Family
  • Carol and Barry McArton
  • The Shinewald Family
  • Dr. Ted and Harriet Lyons
  • Munroe Dental Centre
  • Ixtapa Travel
  • Hill Sokalski Walsh
  • D'arcy and Deacon
  • The Charach Family
  • Esther and Sid Halpern
  • Myers LLP
  • The Lazar Family
  • Dr. Marshall Stitz
  • Cavalier Candies
  • Cdn Visa
  • Kowall Chiropractic Centres
  • Dr. Brent Schacter
  • Doheny Securities
  • Ambassador Mechanical
  • Peerless Garments
  • Pitblado
  • Cindy Lamoureux
  • HUB International
  • Philip Kahanovtich
  • Global Philathropic Canada
  • Sorrento's
  • Taverna Rodos
  • Aziza Family
  • Western Scrap Metals
  • Cascade Financial Group Inc.
  • James Bezan
  • Larry N. Maguire
  • Malaya Marcelino
  • Candice Bergen
  • Safeway
  • John Orlikow
  • Ross Eadie
  • Orthodox Union
  • Saul Simmonds
  • Bridges for Peace
  • Chochy's
  • City Sheet Metal
  • Superlite
  • Stephen Rosenfield
  • Abe and Toni Berenhait
  • The Lofchick Famiy
  • Stringer Rentals
  • John Wishnowski
  • Ingrid Bennet
  • Winnipeg Board of Jewish Education
  • Asper Jewish Community Campus
  • Jewish Federation of Winnipeg
  • Grant Kurian Trucking
  • Shoppers Drug Mart
  • Gulay Plumbing
  • Kristina's
  • West Kildonan Auto
  • The Center for Near East Policy Research Ltd.
  • Sarel Canada
  • Santa Lucia Pizza
  • Center for Near East Policy Research
  • Roofco Winnipeg Roofing
  • Center for Near East Policy Research
  • Nachum Bedein
  • Maric Homes
Rhonda Spivak, Editor

Publisher: Spivak's Jewish Review Ltd.

Opinions expressed in letters to the editor or articles by contributing writers are not necessarily endorsed by Winnipeg Jewish Review.