Winnipeg Jewish Review  
Site Search:
Home  |  Archives  |  Contact Us
Features Local Israel Next Generation Arts/Op-Eds Editorial/Letters Links Obituary/In Memoriam

Dr. Catherine Chatterley



Reply by Michael Keefer,Nov. 23, 2010, and rebuttal by Catherine Chatterley, Nov.25,2010

[Editor’s Note: Prof Keefer is responding to  Dr.. Catherine Chatterley’s article currently running as a Feature article which can be read by clicking here..  Prof Keefer's  response was published on  November 23, 2010.  Following that, Dr. Chatterly wrote in with a Rebuttal to  Keffer. Both Keefer's response and  Chatterley's rebuttal are printed below]


 by Michael Keefer, Professor, School of English and Theatre Studies, University of Guelph, November 23, 2010

I applaud Dr. Catherine Chatterley’s statement (in her November 15 article on “Campus Antisemitism” currently running as a Feature article) that debates over subjects like antisemitism, Israel, and Palestine “must be self-reflexive, reasoned, and accurate,” and that we need to avoid ad hominem attacks, so as to “encourage intelligent discussion and debate that employs meaningful, ethical, and accurate language”—the italics are Dr. Chatterley’s—“to describe what are truly difficult, complex, and contested histories.”

But Dr. Chatterley abandons her own standards of ethics and accuracy when she refers to me as exemplifying what she calls “Antisemitism Denial.” It is not unduly sensitive to hear in these words a deliberate echo of “Holocaust Denial”—and therefore a vicious ad hominem attack. Dr. Chatterley’s claim that I “have gone on the assault against antisemitism as a contemporary problem, arguing that there is no such thing and comparing this so-called phantom to the ‘real’ antisemitism of the past,” goes beyond mere inaccuracy: it is a flagrant falsehood.

In addition to my work in other fields, I am the editor and part-author of Antisemitism Real and Imagined: Responses to the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism (Waterloo: The Canadian Charger, 2010).  This book includes texts by eleven Canadian scholars and human rights activists (a majority of whom, as it happens, are Jewish), and by the leaders of seven human rights organizations. Far from minimizing the reality of contemporary antisemitism, these texts recurrently express concern that uncritical support for the state of Israel’s systematic violations of Palestinian human rights could feed a renewal of antisemitic prejudice and hatred in this country.

My own contributions, which make up just over half of the book, include an extended analysis of the statistical evidence relating to antisemitic incidents and hate crimes. My study of UK government figures, Statistics Canada data, the annual incident-report tallies published by the Community Security Trust (CST) in Britain, and B’nai Brith Canada’s annual audits of antisemitic incidents, led me to conclude that the CPCCA’s claims of an alarming resurgence of antisemitism in Canada are untrue, and B’nai Brith’s figures seriously inflated. But after noting that police statistics show a declining trend in hate crimes, I wrote that “I am not suggesting that we should find anything very reassuring about the data analyzed in this chapter: Jews are indeed being disproportionately targeted by hatemongers” (p. 191).

Readers of my contributions to the book will find many further examples of a lively concern over real present-day antisemitism—together with a strong critique of the deceptions practiced by those who imagine that they can get away with smearing advocates of international human rights law by labeling their criticisms of Israeli policies as instances of a “new antisemitism.” 

As for Dr. Chatterley: If she genuinely wishes to earn a reputation for responsible, accurate, and ethical scholarship, she will have to begin by making some effort to live up to her own ideals.



 November 25, 2010
Dear Professor Keefer,
Re: Your book, Antisemitism: Real and Imagined, published in 2010 by a website based in Waterloo,
In your public discussions about this book you make a distinction between what you view as real antisemitism and the new antisemitism, which you call a “rhetorical shell game” and “rhetorical trickery.” You say that real antisemitism is a “toxic prejudice,” now largely on the wane in Canada, and that the new antisemitism is “not new and it’s not really antisemitism” but it makes “use of this history of suffering, this history of martyrdom, in a way that is at the service of unacceptable political positions.” You argue that in 1973, when “real antisemitism was in rapid decline . . . leading figures in the Anti-Defamation League [tried to] redefine antisemitism to incorporate criticism of the State of Israel, and to use that as a way for providing public support . . . to hold onto the conquered territories, the occupied territories.”
Sources: youtube wide eye cinema
(The two public comments below your discussion on the last site clearly illustrate the consistencies between old and new, or classic and contemporary, antisemitism.)
The CPCCA (Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism), you argue, is the 2002 creation of “Irwin Cotler in collaboration with the Israeli Foreign Ministry.” You claim that “the first iteration of this project fell through because groups like the Anti-Defamation League in the United States says ‘it has Israel’s fingerprints too obviously all over it . . . be more subtle, be clever.’” You say that the intention of the CPCCA is to “activate Canadian public opinion in support of this completely illegitimate equation of antisemitism, or identification of criticism of the State of Israel as antisemitism.” The larger intention, you say, is “to alter the orientation of, for example, our police forces when they are enforcing our hate crime laws, to alter the ways in which courts might look at this issue,” and you speculate that there may be changes made to the Canadian Criminal Code.
The cross-country book tour you led this year across our campuses was provocatively titled: “Criticize Israel—Go to Jail?” Many parents are concerned by what they see as growing anti-Israel hostility on campus and its misdirection toward their children. In relation to campus, you state: “Let’s be honest, you know, there are occasional episodes where students on university campuses get too excited and are rude to each other.” Many people associated with York Uni
<<Previous Article       Next Article >>
Subscribe to the Winnipeg Jewish Review
  • Commercial Pool
  • Coughlin Insurance
  • Wallace + Wallace
  • Joyce Rykiss
  • The J Hansen HVAC Group
  • Derksen Plumbing
  • Munroe Pharmacy
  • Imperial Soap
  • Bridges for Peace
  • GTP
  • Piston Ring
  • Winnipeg Board of Jewish Education
  • Asper Jewish Community Campus
  • Jewish Federation of Winnipeg
  • Nick's Inn
  • Lori Shenkarow
  • Roseman Corp.
  • Eddie's Gravel Supply
  • Tyler Bucklaschuk
  • TD Canada Trust
  • Bruce Shefrin Interior Design
  • Fair Service
  • Daien Denture Clinic
  • Thovaldson Care
  • Laufman Reprographics
  • Amalgamated Drywall Systems Ltd.
  • Sveinson Construction
  • The Home Store
  • KC Enterprises Ltd.
  • Maric Homes
  • Artista Homes
  • Tradesman Mechanical
  • Accurate Lawn & Garden
  • Ronald B. Zimmerman
  • Lanny Silver
  • Fetching Style
  • HUB International
  • Philip Kahanovtich
  • Global Philathropic Canada
  • Sorrento's
  • Taverna Rodos
  • Stringer Rentals
  • Gimli Home Hardware
  • Interlake C Store
  • John Wishnowski
  • Ingrid Bennet
  • Lakeside Roofing
  • Grant Kurian Trucking
  • Shoppers Drug Mart
  • Gulay Plumbing
  • Sean Fisher
  • Kristina's
  • The Center for Near East Policy Research Ltd.
  • Sarel Canada
  • Santa Lucia Pizza
  • Center for Near East Policy Research
  • Roofco Winnipeg Roofing
  • Center for Near East Policy Research
  • Nachum Bedein
  • Maric Homes
Rhonda Spivak, Editor

Publisher: Spivak's Jewish Review Ltd.

Opinions expressed in letters to the editor or articles by contributing writers are not necessarily endorsed by Winnipeg Jewish Review.